The Canon PowerShot G1
Last Updated 29 Mar 03
Copyright 2003 by Stephen Vermeulen
Introduction
The digital camera market place is currently (January 2001) split into
the following segments (prices in Canadian $, to convert to US$ divide
by 1.5):
-
cameras for kids, small point and shoot units with 320x200 or 640x400 resolution
priced near the $100 mark
-
1.3M pixel point and shoot entry level units, some (like the Fuji
1400) with optical zoom, covering the $500-700 range
-
2M pixel point, which extends from nice point and shoot units, to sophisticated
image stabilized 10x zoom units like the Olympus
C-2100UZ, these cameras range from the $700 level up to the $1500 point
-
3M pixel cameras that tend to have more manual controls, at least have
a 3x optical zoom and have more flash and add on lens options. These
overlap the 2M pixel price range, going from about $1000 to $2000
-
the semi-pro cameras that are typically built around a 35mm SLR body, have
at least a 3M pixel sensor and take at least $3000 out of your wallet
-
the real-pro cameras that are even more expensive.
There are a lot of different options available among these cameras and
market segments that can make a purchase decision quite difficult.
This page is an attempt to capture some of the decision making process
that I went though when selecting my Canon G1.
Photography Types
In the past 20 years with 35mm based equipment (an old Pentax Spotmatic
SLR and a Pentax point and shoot 35mm with 3x zoom) the majority of my
photography has fallen into the following areas:
-
family pictures
-
vacation photos
-
macro (mainly flowers and plants)
-
landscape scenery
-
architecture
While I have shot a fair amount of sports and candids, this was mainly
done in my high school year book days, so is not something I do on a regular
basis. I have found that a 28-135mm zoom on my 35mm SLR was about the ideal
lens (except for its great weight, size and relatively slow speed) for
this combination of photography. In fact, I found that the Pentax point
and shoot, which has about a 28-105mm lens, was an almost complete replacement
for the old SLR, what little bit it lacked in image quality or manual controls,
it made up for in portability - so it got used a lot more. I have also
done a number of larger than 8x10 enlargements, so wanted something that
had enough quality to do a nice 11x14 or larger.
Features
Given this set of requirements I came up with the following initial features
list:
-
3M pixel sensor
-
rechargable batteries
-
3x optical zoom
-
hotshoe for external flash
-
macro capability
-
full automatic mode
-
full manual capability
-
panorama assist function
-
some sort of accessory lens mount
-
USB interface for fast downloads
-
LCD for review of pictures in the camera
Most of the current crop of 3M pixel cameras provided most of these features
so choosing amongst them was somewhat difficult. In the end I rather arbitrarily
narrowed my search to the main camera name brands (Canon, Nikon, Fuji and
Olympus) plus Sony and Toshiba since these were all available at local
retailers. After some initial consideration I eliminated:
-
Fuji, because the sensor was not a true 3M pixel unit, although the additional
speed it provided and the compact design of their FinePix
4700 were both tempting. Their S1
Pro was too expensive - maybe in a few years I'll be switching over
to an SLR style digi-cam, but by then the big players will be making interchangable
lens systems that are designed for the smaller sensor of the digi-cam,
meaning that for less money we'll get a far faster, more compact and lighter
lens.
-
Sony, because of their use of the memory stick, even though their price
is competitive today I'm not convinced it will remain so. The one that
tempted me the most was their cute little DSC-P1
because of its compact size and the potential for underwater photography
using their case. Their DSC-S70
was also of interest. In the end the P1 was just too much more than the
other 3M pixel cameras and the price and availabililty of the underwater
case were still uncertain. Sony was also charging a bit of a premium
for their S70 over other digicams so I eliminated it too.
-
Toshiba, in the end I eliminated this as they are not really that mainstream
a camera manufacturer, so getting additional third party stuff (like lens
and flash add-ons etc.) probably is not going to happen (the same probably
applies to Sony too).
That left the following five cameras as the serious candidates:
-
Nikon's 990,
as this was probably the most popular out there, and it was the latest
in a long line of earlier designs it gets a lot of exposure that you just
cannot ignore.
-
Olympus's C-3030Z
or C-3000Z, seem
to be getting well received and as I have a friend who is now into his
second Olympus digicam (the 2M pixel C-2100UZ)
these were cameras I seriously considered.
-
Canon's S-20 and
new G1, which have
received good reviews from a number of sites.
For reviews, sample photos and feature comparisions these are the main
sites I looked at:
At this point I eliminated:
-
the S-20 because it lacked a 3x zoom. I was very tempted to go with
it despite this, because its a bit more portable, but once I compared an
S-20 to a G1 in a hands-on fashion I found the S-20's smaller size made
it harder to hold and felt the shorter zoom would be a limitation when
taking pictures of the kids at play.
-
the Olympus units because they had no particular advantage that I could
see over the Nikon and were less widely available, hence a bit more expensive.
Also, I'm somewhat worried by the fact that twice in the past the Smart
Media system has had technical problems when a new larger capacity cards
appeared on the market (I think it was when they went from 8Meg to 16Meg
and again when they went from 16Meg to 32Meg). Because I was thinking in
terms of 128 to 256Meg of storage this lack of forwards compatibility concerned
me.
The Final Decision
Now it was just down to the Nikon 990 and the Canon G1. At this point I
compared the remaining feature differences between the two and viewed many
of the published sample pictures. I even printed a couple of pictures
on my Epson PhotoStylus EX to see if the printed quality was really as
good as people were claiming (I found that my printer was the limiting
factor below 11x14 size). As far as the features went the G1 only had a
few things the 990 didn't (and the reverse was true too). The three
that interested me the most were:
-
flash hot shoe
-
compact flash type 2 compatibility
-
panorama assist
Of these, the one that made up my mind was the compact flash type 2 compatibility.
I figured that for a typical vacation I would need to be able to save about
300 pictures (on past experience of a roll of film per day), which at about
1Meg per picture would mean I would have to buy about 300Meg of CF cards.
At today's prices in Canada that amounts to about $1200 for storage. Upon
further investigation I found that the price of a 340Meg microdrive
was about $460, or a 1Gig unit for about $660. Thinking that my past
experience of about 1 roll of film per day of vacation might be a bit conservative
I decided to go with the Canon G1 and the 1Gig microdrive. I realized that
there were at least two ways out of this problem (appart from buying so
much CompactFlash storage) if I went with the Nikon, I could take a laptop
computer with me or I could get one of the digital wallet type devices
(the Image tank, Digital
Wallet or the Iomega FotoShow
or Click solutions),
but each was going to be yet more gear to carry along.
Conclusion
I am quite happy with the Canon G1, in fact I would probably be getting
along just fine with either the Nikon or Olympus. There are two things
about the Canon that I particularly like now I have it, which I did not
consider important in my initial decision:
-
the swivel out and tilt LCD display is really great. For indoor photography
I use this exclusively to compose the shots. I find it is a real help when
taking pictures of children as you can easily shoot from waist or even
floor level. Its also a help when taking candid shots of adults as they
are not as aware of the fact you are composing a picture, since you may
be looking down or even sideways while doing so. Thinking back to my days
as a high school year book photographer, this would have been a great aid!
The Nikon 990's two part body system would probably come close to this
degree of flexibility. I have found this LCD to be quite usable in daylight
situations, but its winter here currently and the sun is pretty low in
the sky, so maybe this will change in the summer.
-
the rechargable lithium battery pack is fantastic. I've done about 350
photos on one charge (with flash and using the LCD display the whole time
and saving to a 1Gig microdrive) with battery still left. Some reviews
have reported in the range of 500. This is a factor of about 3 to
7 times what most other cameras get from their batteries. Canon's manual
claims about 260 with the LCD on and about 800 bu just using the view finder.
Other Considerations
If you are into animal, bird or perhaps sports photography then take a
look into the Olympus C-2100UZ which has a stabilized 10 times optical
zoom in a 2M pixel camera. When Olympus brings one of these out with a
3M or higher sensor and microdrive compatibility (which is almost what
the Canon is doing with the just-announced PowerShot
Pro 90IS) its going to be a really tempting choice. I played with one
a friend has, and found the image stabilization feature to be very useful
for indoor natural light photography as well (it might eliminate the need
for a tripod), even if you are not interested in the long telephoto applications.
External Flash Units
The Canon Speedlite 420EX is a very nice unit, but its a bit on the expensive
side, especially if you don't do much flash photography, or would like
to be able to use the flash with another camera. These web sites discuss
using other external flashes with the G1 and other cameras:
back to vermeulen.ca home